<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla chooses PhishTank data</title>
	<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/11/14/mozilla-chooses-phishtank-data/</link>
	<description>Making the Internet safer and faster</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: PhishTank SiteChecker</title>
		<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/11/14/mozilla-chooses-phishtank-data/#comment-4301</link>
		<author>PhishTank SiteChecker</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 05:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/11/14/mozilla-chooses-phishtank-data/#comment-4301</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Awesome we got mentioned....&lt;/strong&gt;

Aww&#8230;only one sentence.   Oh well. Today The Washington (that&#8217;s where I live!) Post wrote an article on Mozilla testing phishing protection in IE7 and Firefox using data from phishtank.com (Rant: if only they tested the browser with this add...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Awesome we got mentioned&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Aww&#8230;only one sentence.   Oh well. Today The Washington (that&#8217;s where I live!) Post wrote an article on Mozilla testing phishing protection in IE7 and Firefox using data from phishtank.com (Rant: if only they tested the browser with this add&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
