<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNET reports: ISPs aren&#8217;t very good at DNS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/</link>
	<description>Making the Internet safer and faster</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:12:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyper123.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verizon is dropping a lot of DNS requests</title>
		<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-133760</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyper123.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verizon is dropping a lot of DNS requests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-133760</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story   Tags: DNS, Verizon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story   Tags: DNS, Verizon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cr::blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verizon drops 3.14% of all DNS requests</title>
		<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>cr::blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verizon drops 3.14% of all DNS requests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-656</guid>
		<description>[...] From a post over at the OpenDNS Blog, most ISP&#8217;s are not providing good DNS service. Big shocker. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From a post over at the OpenDNS Blog, most ISP&#8217;s are not providing good DNS service. Big shocker. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-655</guid>
		<description>At my last company, we had Verizon Business DSL.  For two weeks solid we had constant DNS issues, as did a lot of the internet (according to a large amount of complaint posts on dslreports).  Verizon denied that there was any issues on their end, so we ended up going with Speakeasy DSL (small company, 7 people) and never looked back.

I too was a speakeasy customer at home (before I moved).  Wonderful company.

Verizon is a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At my last company, we had Verizon Business DSL.  For two weeks solid we had constant DNS issues, as did a lot of the internet (according to a large amount of complaint posts on dslreports).  Verizon denied that there was any issues on their end, so we ended up going with Speakeasy DSL (small company, 7 people) and never looked back.</p>
<p>I too was a speakeasy customer at home (before I moved).  Wonderful company.</p>
<p>Verizon is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi Pittman</title>
		<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi Pittman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 02:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-654</guid>
		<description>I would love to have opendns store a username or a cookie so that my settings &quot;stick&quot;...I&#039;m also on a dynamic ip that gets dropped alot so everytime it does I revert to default settings which are still good but I prefer the .cm to .com fix which is not a default anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to have opendns store a username or a cookie so that my settings &#8220;stick&#8221;&#8230;I&#8217;m also on a dynamic ip that gets dropped alot so everytime it does I revert to default settings which are still good but I prefer the .cm to .com fix which is not a default anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zak</title>
		<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-650</guid>
		<description>I just noticed OpenDNS through this article and it looks interesting.  Out of curiousity, how would I mirror DNS information (either from this project or another server) and run a DNS server on my own network?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed OpenDNS through this article and it looks interesting.  Out of curiousity, how would I mirror DNS information (either from this project or another server) and run a DNS server on my own network?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stu</title>
		<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-645</guid>
		<description>There is a distinction that I&#039;m missing with this article.  What tests are being conducted?  Is this simply a test from a client of the network or at the server itself.  DNS typically uses UDP which is a best effort service and, yes, you will get packet loss in this case.  If you&#039;re simply looking at it from the client side and you don&#039;t really know what the server is doing, you might be blaming the wrong thing.  

Any more info on this before you spread the FUD too far?

stu =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a distinction that I&#8217;m missing with this article.  What tests are being conducted?  Is this simply a test from a client of the network or at the server itself.  DNS typically uses UDP which is a best effort service and, yes, you will get packet loss in this case.  If you&#8217;re simply looking at it from the client side and you don&#8217;t really know what the server is doing, you might be blaming the wrong thing.  </p>
<p>Any more info on this before you spread the FUD too far?</p>
<p>stu =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Cooper</title>
		<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-644</guid>
		<description>David, good idea, but many of us have quite dynamic IPs, Im not really sure how your settings system intends to work with those, I think its important to get the best settings as the default, and also to detect dynamic ips, so as the service grows as our IPs change we don&#039;t keep getting Open DNS in different modes so to speak.  Looking forward to the London hosts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, good idea, but many of us have quite dynamic IPs, Im not really sure how your settings system intends to work with those, I think its important to get the best settings as the default, and also to detect dynamic ips, so as the service grows as our IPs change we don&#8217;t keep getting Open DNS in different modes so to speak.  Looking forward to the London hosts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ulevitch</title>
		<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ulevitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-640</guid>
		<description>Lane,

That&#039;s a good comment.  I think we&#039;d be wise to let users pick the search engine that handled our page too.  I&#039;ll see what we can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lane,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good comment.  I think we&#8217;d be wise to let users pick the search engine that handled our page too.  I&#8217;ll see what we can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane</title>
		<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-639</guid>
		<description>I really find this service you guys are offering to be a big community service of sorts.  What I don&#039;t understand is why you haven&#039;t offered us the option to search google when the domain is typed wrong.  Don&#039;t take this the wrong way but your search page isn&#039;t the best known and an unknowing user would assume they had been redirected to a spyware site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really find this service you guys are offering to be a big community service of sorts.  What I don&#8217;t understand is why you haven&#8217;t offered us the option to search google when the domain is typed wrong.  Don&#8217;t take this the wrong way but your search page isn&#8217;t the best known and an unknowing user would assume they had been redirected to a spyware site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pd</title>
		<link>http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opendns.com/2006/08/17/cnet-reports-isps-arent-very-good-at-dns/#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Add to that list TPG in Australia, their DNS servers routinely fell over at 1am nightly thus resulting in me maintaining my HOSTS file with 50+ entries. This was over 2 years ago as since then I changed ISP&#039;s purely on their lack of response to my complaints and general bad service.

If only OpenDNS was around back then!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add to that list TPG in Australia, their DNS servers routinely fell over at 1am nightly thus resulting in me maintaining my HOSTS file with 50+ entries. This was over 2 years ago as since then I changed ISP&#8217;s purely on their lack of response to my complaints and general bad service.</p>
<p>If only OpenDNS was around back then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

